Human Rights only for the rich and powerful?
HorNet has recently supported a bid to become an intervener in the case of big freehold interests suing the government over key measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024, which they claim are infringing upon their human rights and causing them financial losses. We believe this to be a cynical attempt to block reform by wealthy property owners.
Several groups led by grassroots campaign Free Leaseholders secured pro bono legal help and petitioned the court to intervene in the case in support of the government. These groups represent people who would be directly affected by the outcome of this case unlike the government who are supposed to represent us. The other groups were SHAC, the Federation of Private Residents’ Associations, and the Brighton Hove and District Leaseholders Association.
Our short submission statement was : –
“We are proud to support this initiative by Free Leaseholders. While our campaign is focused on privately managed unadopted estates, our supporters will suffer if the freeholders in this case win their claim. Our aim is abolition of this model which would threaten the income stream of investors and managing agents who could then bring an action on similar grounds if a precedent is set.
We have discovered that these estates are becoming a new asset class – ‘son of leasehold’ – to be traded like any other commodity. A significant number of homeowners are trapped into a monopoly management provider because they are embedded in the transfer deeds. Often it is the same managing agents which exploit leaseholders that equally fleece estate residents via unregulated estate charges. We do have a strong interest in the outcome of this case.”
At its case management hearing on Friday 23rd May the court rejected the application on grounds that the government represented our interests and also for some reason they didn’t approve of us having free legal representation! To add to the courtroom drama, Michael Gove, now Lord Gove, the previous secretary of state, threw his weight behind the Free Leaseholders’ coalition intervener application with the offer of a written witness statement, something also rejected by the court. We will publish the hearing transcript when it becomes available.
It is typical of the rich to use any technical legal loophole they can to continue to exploit ordinary folk, and this case seems to fit that bill. It is before the courts now as a judicial review to see if there is a case to answer. The full judicial review will be held in July. The government will have to use taxpayers money to defend this frivolous and vexatious complaint from the freehold owners. Let’s hope common sense prevails here. On what planet do corporations have HUMAN rights? And what about leaseholders human rights? Their right to property ownership has been denied by the leasehold system.
Surely human rights over property apply to individual human beings, not corporations/companies – it is a human right, not a corporate one in our view. These arrogant organisations treat ordinary people with such contempt – we are not so stupid we can’t see what you are up to, and we will continue to resist! We have lost this battle but our fight is far from over. Together as grassroots campaigns, we have shown we are a formidable force.
Harry Scoffin of Free Leaseholders was interviewed by LBC after the verdict.





