Extra Bills through Help to Buy!

A recent article in the Daily Mail has highlighted the exploitative scandal of leasehold houses being sold to innocent first time buyers under the governments “Help to Buy” scheme. It estimates 1 in 7 Help to Buy new homes are leasehold. Not only are the home owners being exploited, but the tax payer too.

The article fails to mention the extra bills for estate maintenance all new build home owners face, and the potential long term effect on the value of these homes in comparison to older, truly freehold houses.

The question is – who is Help to Buy really helping? The government is able to tick a box over housing promises and the commercial house builders are being subsidised to rip off ordinary home owners and the taxpayer!

If you have used Help to Buy and find you are being forced to pay for estate maintenance with no accountability or value for money, please either comment here or join our Facebook group.

 


Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Ch5 TV Series on New Build Home Problems

Channel 5 are filming a new series this summer following families who have had issues after the builder has left. Whilst the main focus may be snagging, they have confirmed that they would take a case study regarding the land maintenance scandal.

So, if you want to be a TV star and tell your story about this rip off then email vicky.maitland@channel5.com or phone 0203 580 3867

If anyone is willing to do this, it may help us all by raising the profile of the issue.


Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Numbers Growing and Working Away

To all members new and old, this is to bring you up to speed with our activities.

There are now nearly 1,200 FaceBook group members and many others who have joined our private forum and been in contact by email. Networking has proved a tremendous success and members UK wide shared experiences confirm the common concerns which are:

Pressure of time and misleading information during the purchase process.

Promotion of builder recommended solicitors who are not informing purchasers of the implications of their covenants.

High costs, especially for managing the companies, and poor value for money.

No choice of provider, and no alternative dispute resolution process.

No consumer rights. Small claims courts being used to force payment in dispute.

Both leasehold and freehold properties are affected by establishment of an estate rent charge and associated covenants in the deeds.

The law in Scotland is different, but the issues similar.

Nearly all new build estates over the past 10 years are affected by this – estimated at 1 million homes.

Our conclusion is that the law must to changed – this positively feudal set up is not fit for purpose in the 21st century.

What we are doing:

Members are contacting their MPs and there are indications we will find two or three who will sponsor our campaign to change the law. The election is both a challenge and an opportunity and members are asking at the hustings what parties intend to do for us.

We are in discussions with a legal firm to develop a model for challenging the monopoly aspect of this exploitative set up. Also we are exploring the case for group actions against solicitors and vendors for negligence and misrepresentation. In Scotland there may be a further challenge at the Lands Tribunal – see this post.

We have submitted a written briefing paper to the All Party Parliamentary Group on Leasehold and Common Hold Reform and hope to make more representations for a change in the law to protect us when it reconvenes after the election.

We continue to raise the profile of our issues at every opportunity we can, and are building a collection of useful press contacts. At the moment our problems are overshadowed by the leasehold scandal which has had considerable press coverage, but we plan to build on that by pointing out the many similarities in the two situations e.g. the same players are exploiting new home owners, not being truthful about the implications of buying their houses, using feudal land law to their advantage, retention of assets to make more money and generally behaving in an unethical and immoral fashion.

 

 


Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail